Inference that learns your workload.
ML.ai Inference, powered by ML.ai, helps you choose the outcome—not a model for every step. Route, verify and optimize your AI workload without losing sight of quality.
Trusted by leading teams
NeoSapien, Pepsi, Heineken, American Express, Adidas, McKesson, American Electric Power, A. O. Smith, FanDuel, AWS, Tata Motors, Stellantis, Iron Mountain, Suntory, BT Group, Nissan, Breitling, América Móvil, DISH Network, McDonald's.
A layer of intelligence.
Not another model.
ML.ai Inference is powered by ML.ai: it directs each step to a suitable route and keeps your acceptance criteria in the loop.
Your application stays yours. ML.ai sits between your workflow and the model stack, handling routing, verification, learning and policy.
It learns. It grows.
It keeps improving.
Shadow first. Evaluate before a shift. Watch what happens after it.
Observe without disruption.
Mirror existing calls while the original provider continues serving your users. Establish a baseline before changing a route.
Learn the work you repeat.
Learn recurring patterns from the workload and develop a tuned candidate for that work. Evaluation determines whether it is ready.
by design.
Shift only what proves itself.
Promote a validated route through an evaluation gate. Begin with a controlled slice while the existing path remains available.
Keep the outcome in view.
Observe cost, quality, latency and policy after the shift. Keep monitoring the workload as requests and requirements change.
Every request.
A considered decision.
See the work behind the response, not just the model name.
Intelligent routing
Match model effort to the task, instead of paying for the most capable route every time.
Quality gates
Evaluate candidates against your acceptance criteria before promoting a route.
Email alex@example.com••••••••••••
Order #1042
Task Replacement request
Tenant policy
Apply your input, output and data-handling boundaries to the request.
Observability
Inspect the decision and its checks in a trace, not just a final answer.
The same quality bar.
A more efficient route.
Keep cost, quality and latency in the same frame.
Less wasted capability.
More work completed.
Target reduction
Reserve expensive capability for the work that needs it.
Your acceptance bar
The target is parity or better, not cheaper but worse.
Target improvement
Reduce the work required to produce an accepted answer.
ML.ai design targets, not averages across customers. Validate them on your workload during the pilot.
What could your
workload save?
Your workload sets the starting point. Your pilot establishes the result.
Lower monthly AI spend
28% faster responses · 21-day rollout
Control follows
every request.
Keep routing within the boundaries you define.
Private deployment is scoped with the ML.ai team. The globe is a conceptual routing illustration, not a service-region map.
Different workloads.
One way to run them.
Three examples of the same principle: the task determines the effort.
Understand the request.
Classify and summarize a support message into a clear next step.
Make information usable.
Return clean fields that can be checked against a defined schema.
– submitCharge(payload) + enforceIdempotency(key) + submitCharge(payload, key)
Reason through complexity.
Use a higher-effort route when the problem needs more reasoning.
Start in shadow.
Keep your application.
Observe an existing workload first. Define acceptance tests, then agree the integration and promotion path with ML.ai.
{
"workload": "support_summary",
"mode": "shadow",
"routing_tier": "auto",
"quality_gate": "baseline",
"policy": "tenant_default"
}Conceptual configuration. Confirm the production integration with ML.ai.
One workload.
Thirty days to prove it.
Agree the cost, quality and rollout criteria before moving traffic.
Watch
Observe the current workload.
Your starting baselineLearn
Agree the acceptance targets.
A measurable definition of successProve
Measure a controlled live slice.
Evidence from your workloadDecide
Scale when the evidence earns it.
A decision you can defendML.ai states no fee is owed if agreed pilot targets are missed. Confirm the pilot terms with the team.
A few things worth knowing.
What is the difference between Inference and ML.ai?
Does the demonstration call a real model?
Do I need to rewrite my integration?
Can I choose a particular underlying model?
Are the savings guaranteed?
Bring the workload.
Let the evidence decide.
Visuals demonstrate product concepts. Design targets are not a performance guarantee.